This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
sts2 [2021/11/16 15:58] dteal |
sts2 [2021/11/18 14:40] (current) dteal |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
===== Etch Recipes ===== | ===== Etch Recipes ===== | ||
- | ===== Shallow DRIE Etch ===== | + | ==== Shallow DRIE Etch ==== |
For Si etching down to perhaps 40um deep. | For Si etching down to perhaps 40um deep. | ||
- | Typically, we deposit 2um MiR 701 photoresist on top of silicon, then use on the order of 60 cycles of the standard sts2 deep silicon etch. DRIE photoresist vs. silicon etch selectivity is around 1:50 or 1:100 (it varies). | + | Typically, we deposit 2um MiR 701 photoresist |
- | + | ||
- | ==== Process Notes ==== | + | |
^ Date ^ Person ^ Data ^ | ^ Date ^ Person ^ Data ^ | ||
| 20 July 2021 | Daniel | Hard baked with recipe U on axcelis. 50 cycles HF etch -> 20um depth, 25 more cycles HF -> 30um depth, 25 cycles LF -> 40um depth in large areas. | | | 20 July 2021 | Daniel | Hard baked with recipe U on axcelis. 50 cycles HF etch -> 20um depth, 25 more cycles HF -> 30um depth, 25 cycles LF -> 40um depth in large areas. | | ||
- | ===== Deep DRIE Etch ===== | + | ==== Deep DRIE Etch ==== |
Deeper etches need a thicker mask material. DRIE photoresist vs. silicon etch selectivity is around 1:50 or 1:100 (it varies), so a 550um through-wafer etch needs at least 10um photoresist. SiO2 vs. Si selectivity is also around 1:100 but reliably higher than photoresist selectivity (but not enough to justify the extra steps required to deposit 5um+ oxide), and metal selectivity is near-infinite (but metal masks are not allowed in sts2 as the metal sputters off and contaminates the chamber, which is not good for a tool shared by multiple projects). | Deeper etches need a thicker mask material. DRIE photoresist vs. silicon etch selectivity is around 1:50 or 1:100 (it varies), so a 550um through-wafer etch needs at least 10um photoresist. SiO2 vs. Si selectivity is also around 1:100 but reliably higher than photoresist selectivity (but not enough to justify the extra steps required to deposit 5um+ oxide), and metal selectivity is near-infinite (but metal masks are not allowed in sts2 as the metal sputters off and contaminates the chamber, which is not good for a tool shared by multiple projects). | ||
Line 29: | Line 27: | ||
Previously, we've used 12um AZ P4620 resist hard baked at 120C for one hour. Also, etches with less than 100um of Si thickness remaining require a handle wafer in the sts2 tool. | Previously, we've used 12um AZ P4620 resist hard baked at 120C for one hour. Also, etches with less than 100um of Si thickness remaining require a handle wafer in the sts2 tool. | ||
- | |||
- | ==== Process Notes ==== | ||
^ Date ^ Person ^ Data ^ | ^ Date ^ Person ^ Data ^ |